Prove the agency value before setting a price.
Compare paired task timings and correction counts. Test whether a proposed workflow actually saves time without increasing errors. The report remains unverified until independent review.
Paired task observations
Enter four numeric columns per synthetic task. Each row compares the same administrative task with and without the proposed tool. At least 20 paired observations are needed to assess the sample.
Numbers only. Do not enter names, dates of birth, passport numbers, email addresses, client narratives or confidential records. No entries are uploaded, stored or tracked.
Demonstration data are generated synthetic examples. They do not represent real clients, agencies, training results or legitimate proof of savings.
Evidence quality report
No paired observations evaluated. Zero verified study results.
- Valid paired observations
- —
- Average time saved per task
- —
- Median time saved
- —
- Conservative uncertainty interval
- —
- Tasks that took longer with the tool
- —
- Distinct task patterns
- —
- Largest repeated task-pattern share
- —
- Correction counts, before / with tool
- —
- Conservative time-value screen (€ / case)
- —
- Half-value pricing screen (€ / case)
- —
Pricing cannot be screened until paired evidence has been evaluated. No real customer value is proven.
No claim of measured benefit. An adequate task sample, better correction quality and independent observation are needed before any productivity claim or agency fee.
Method: the interval uses paired differences and 2.1 sample standard errors (reported only for 20 or more pairs). This is a simple research screening estimate, not a controlled trial, statistical certainty or proof of causation.